TiLV Asks The Hard Questions, Mayor Mosley Responds

I collected the most frequently asked questions about the tax increase from both comments on this site and on the TiLV Facebook page, and I sent them off to our Mayor. She responded and I am posting her answers in their entirety, here.

Dear Residents of La Vergne,

Thank you for the opportunity to reply to your questions regarding the proposed tax increase for LaVergne. I have struggled with the decision and spent many sleepless nights trying to figure out alternatives. But to give you some history, for well over a decade the city had not increased water/sewer fees in order to help less fortunate residents.  While this sympathetic approach has been a great boost for families in LaVergne, it has caused serious damage to the city itself; we have been operating our water department in the red since 2007 and our reserve account is virtually drained.

Our other income sources had previously been from building permits, largely in the Lake Forest subdivision. There were few checks and balances in place – the builders and developer had virtually free reign so they built inexpensive houses in sardine neighborhoods.  Then the housing market tanked and our residents found themselves stuck, the city found itself stuck with no more revenues coming in, and our expenses were still piling on deep.

While any decision to increase taxes is never popular, sometimes we have nothing left but hard choices and that is what we’re now faced with.  The party is over and it’s now time to pay the band.  The challenge is that if we spread out an increase, it has to be approved every year.  Frankly after going 18 years with no increase, adjusting the tax just one time becomes an obvious choice.

But you rightfully ask why can’t the city cut expenses? Why do we need to keep parks open?  It’s coming down to the nitty-gritty, so I do appreciate the chance to answer your questions.

1. What are some specific items that are being cut from the budget to save the city money?

City workers are no longer getting automatic raises.  There is no 3% available this year. Additionally, money paid to non-profits has been severely limited –including cuts to Second Harvest Food Bank, Box 100, YMCA, and more.  When you compare the number of city workers we have with the number employed by our neighbor Smyrna, you’ll see we are down to the bare bones with our staffing:

The total does not add up because this is just a sampling on pretty standard services that residents expect a city to provide.

Editor’s Note: The population of Smyrna is 38,073 according to their website. The population of La Vergne is 32,588 according to 2010 U.S. Census figures.

2. What’s up with all these new police cruisers I am seeing all over the place? Why did you replace all these cars when the city is broke?

The newest cruiser was purchased this year when another was totaled by a drunk driver. That driver’s insurance paid for the new vehicle. Otherwise, the newest car is 2008.  It is true that you will see new city police cruisers in the new budget, however.  Because the cars go full-time with three police shifts, they wear out quickly.  Instead of outright buying new vehicles, though, the city is instituting a lease program so the cars can be changed out every three to four years. Our police cars do look new because our officers conscientiously take care of them.

3. You say there’s not enough police officers, yet I see several police cars come up on the scene of a wreck or someone they have pulled over. Why is that?

Please remember there have been lone police officers shot during routine traffic stops all over the country. We do not have enough officers to ride double in a car, so when a car is pulled over and another officer is available they will both stop to back each other up.  When there is a traffic stop, you never know who is in the car or whether they have a gun with the intention to do harm.  Because the safety of my officers is one of my top priorities, this practice will continue as long as I am mayor.

4. Why are we getting hit with both a water rate increase AND a tax increase at the same time? Don’t you know unemployment is up and prices are increasing?

Prices are increasing across the board, including for the city.  The city has to pay more for gas, more for the chemicals to keep the water clean, more for paper, more for all the products we need to keep the city operating.  In addition, health insurance for city workers increased by 25% this year – one of the key reasons there are no raises for employees at this time.  They are fairly low-paid already, so the greater value to them was paying their higher insurance premium rather than a cost of living increase.  Why don’t we charge the employees for health care coverage?  It is something that may be considered in future budget years, but for now it is one true benefit we can provide for workers who are already underpaid.

However, the question is about water/sewer and taxes going up at the same time.  The city has been subsidizing the sewer fees for between 60 and 80 cents per 100 cubic feet for several years. We fought the increased fees that Nashville was charging alongside other cities (Brentwood, etc.) and we got the fee lowered from $1.47 to $1.17.  To avoid losing this sewer service completely, our hand was forced. However, these increases were never charged to the consumer. Those reserve funds are gone because we have subsidized the citizens of LaVergne for four years and can just no longer afford to do this.   In April alone, our bill to Metro-Nashville was over $140,000.

The reason we have to consider a tax increase at this time is we are legally obligated to pass a balanced budget by state law. Without an increase, we would be $1.8 million in the red.  Our annual operating budget is roughly $13 million and Smyrna’s is about $65 million, I believe. Clearly, there are no more cuts to be made.

5. How do you expect people to pay for such a huge increase? Don’t you know we’re poor?

Perhaps people believe all of their taxes are going up.  While we have no control over what the County charges for taxes, our city taxes have not increased for 18 years. For a house appraised at $100,000, though, you currently pay $125 p/year in property taxes. It’s true that amount will double.  So you’ll be paying $250 p/year – or an additional $10 p/month. For a $200,000 house, the amount is $20 more p/month. How do we expect people to pay for the increase?  Everyone is different and everyone manages their budgets individually.  I can only encourage you to spread the payment out over the year so it is not as painful at the end of the year.  Also, stop by City Hall and pick up from our Chamber of Commerce office a guide to where people can find aid.

6. Why does the Mayor have a city car? Why can’t she drive herself to work?

I am paid $15,000 p/year – $430 higher than the poverty level for a family of two. I consider my job a full-time position and am available at city hall nearly every day. One benefit of the job is the use of a city vehicle, but the truck is used by all city employees – for employee travel, during emergency situations, etc. The reason I drive the truck home is the same reason all police vehicles are driven home – in the event of a major emergency, the vehicles should be scattered so they cannot all be immobilized at one time by a disaster such as a tornado, straight-line winds, etc.  By keeping the vehicles out of the same place at the same time, this prevents all city vehicles from being out-of-service in time of emergencies.

Regarding “the mayor’s vehicle” – it was the vehicle driven by the former IT Director. Not new. The city purchased a 1998 (I believe) Ford Expedition in 2010 which the City Administrator drives.  The vehicle assigned to me has been fitted for emergency response where it is used to block streets during crisis.  Additionally, my husband does happen to be a fire captain trained as an EMT, so having a radio and lights in that specific vehicle, we are able to sometimes be first on the scene which has resulted in lives saved.  If he was not an EMT, then the car would likely be parked permanently at City Hall where all city employees have access to it – just as they do now because it is a community vehicle.

If the residents demand it, I will idle the vehicle and have one less first responder available for calls, a responder available at no cost to the citizens.

7. Why do the police leave their cars running while they’re not driving them all the time? Doesn’t that waste gas?

Police are required to have their cars “drive-ready” at all times.  This does cost a lot of gas money, but it also ensures a quick response. I am talking to Chief Boyd about this practice because it takes less than five seconds to get a key in an ignition and start an engine. I think this could be a great suggestion on one way to save money.

8. What are you doing to bring retail and nice restaurants to La Vergne?

This past week, the City Planner, a dual member of the Planning Commission & Economic Development Advisory Committee, Alderman Sherry Green, and Alderman Tom Broeker attended the annual meeting of the International Council of Shopping Centers. They prepared a very detailed packet that contained information about zoning, lots and large parcels available, city restrictions, the demographics of the population in a 5- and 10- mile radius of the city, and other valuable information needed for a company to consider locating here.  As a result of their attendance and the subsequent meetings, two major retailers are considering locating in La Vergne. When these businesses make their final decision, be assured that residents will very pleased with the news.

9. Was there liability insurance to pay for the lawsuits that the city had to pay for? Where does that money come from?

Insurance does not cover legal losses due to racial discrimination or other discriminatory lawsuits.  When the city lost the most recent litigation, then lost the appeal (and we were assured we’d lose a second appeal), it cost the city roughly $850,000.  The money was paid from the reserve funds of the water department because the accusations were made from that department. That account had $14 million just five years ago. Between the lawsuits and the subsidies paid on behalf of LaVergne consumers, that amount is now about $3 million.

10. Why do the city employees have such good benefits? Why not cut the benefits packages that they receive?

City workers earn a range of minimum wage to $75,000 p/year (city administrator). Police start out at $30,000 p/year – a trifling amount for someone willing to put their life on the line every day.  Because salaries are generally low compared to other municipalities and the private sector, the city does offer a good health care package as a way to keep qualified employees.

11. What are you doing about these previously unfunded mandates? Is there any way to get rid of them?

The biggest unfunded mandate is for the fire department. The previous administration passed a contract that increased the amount paid to the company so that by the end of the contract, they will be getting roughly $4 million per year. I voted “no” on this because I did not feel that the money in question focused enough on man-power issues and more on items that I did not feel the city should have paid in contract form.  The Board passed the contract in October 2010 even with my “no” vote and has been signed, so we are locked in.

12. Why aren’t you closing the Senior Center or doing away with all these programs parks and rec offer?

Do you really want to live in a town like Lesley Knope?  Where there are no ball teams for children, no extracurricular activities, no playgrounds, no bathrooms available, no grass mowed in the city parks? Really?

13. Why did Senna Mosley vote against taxes before, but wants to raise taxes now?

First, there was never a vote on raising the taxes.  I expressed concern over not knowing how the money from a tax increase would be used.  No answers were ever given to me on whether they were raising the money to pay for more police, more fire, to improve roads, to put in new sewer lines. There was no vote ever taken and because I was the lone dissension, it would have passed had it been voted on.

14. The city received more money from property taxes in 2008 than it received in 2001 because we have a ton more people/homes. That money clearly wasn’t being spent wisely. What is being done to ensure those mistakes aren’t repeated?

Before I was elected mayor, the budget process was nothing more than we walked into the meeting room, a thick packet was dropped in front of us, the former leadership immediately called for a vote, and it was approved with barely the benefit of questioning the different departments, much less line items.  We truly are being more transparent with our current budgeting process.  We have made sure the budgets are available online for anyone to see.  All of our budget hearings were open, recorded, and televised and I intend to continue that throughout my tenure in office.

15.  The summary shows that at the end of year without the increase, there would be $3.7mil left in the bank account, but with the increase there is $5.8mil left. That means of the additional $4mil, $2mil is just being put in the bank. So instead of going up to $1.00, why not just go up to $.75 this year?

After that first year, yes … there will be a surplus. But since it is taking 18 years to get one single tax increase, it is obvious there will not be another for at least a decade.  This rate allows us to rebuild our reserve account should major emergencies arise.  The money is being built for major infrastructure projects.  We have to fix our roads. We have to replace old, dilapidated equipment.  We have to be able to function and that’s what this does.

We are not making all repairs in one year.  This is spread out over several years, so yes there may be money left, but next year the price goes up.  I encourage you to look at our five- and ten-year plan to see that nothing is being wasted.

I am doing the things that people have been requesting for years and years and years.  Weather sirens. Fix roads. More police.  More codes people to take care of tall grass and junky yards and businesses.  And now that I’m doing them, I am catching hell for trying to provide the services that people have been demanding.  Let it be known, this is a tax increase that you will probably never see again. And as long as I am in office, I will tell you where every single penny is going.  If people don’t want me in three years, so be it.  I will know that I have done what I was asked to do.  Fix this city – fiscally, physically, and with no regrets.

16. Can the city come out and mow Steve Noe’s yard?

Sorry Steve.

I hope this answers all of your questions.

Sincerely,
Mayor Senna Mosley

33 comments for “TiLV Asks The Hard Questions, Mayor Mosley Responds

  1. Cee Dee
    May 27, 2011 at 9:23 am

    Great answers, Mayor. For those who disagree — why????

  2. Nikki
    May 27, 2011 at 9:26 am

    Ivy – thank you for compiling these questions and posting the answers.

    Is the budget posted online somewhere? I’d love to look at the whole thing so I can get some perspective on this, and perhaps ask a few questions of my own.

  3. Jen Strange
    May 27, 2011 at 9:52 am

    Thank you for this informational post! I am happy to pay the increase in taxes knowing that it is being thoughtfully budgeted. I want our city employees to have a living salary and good benefits, and to be able to respond to our needs.

  4. Leanne
    May 27, 2011 at 10:10 am

    These are all great questions.

    However, what is the city going to do about Lake Forest Estates looking like a UHaul convention every weekend? People are moving out of this subdivision (Lavergne to) left and right because they cant refinance their houses because their property values have plummeted. They cant sell their homes for what they have in them because the values are no longer there and the values falling even further everyday.

    This is very aggravating and a shame for so many who had the all American dream.

    Responses?

    • Sarah N.
      May 27, 2011 at 11:31 am

      The phenomenon of property values plummeting and people losing their homes is hardly unique to LaVergne, TN. It’s been going on all over the nation since the real estate bubble burst and the latest recession began. There’s no magic wand anyone can wave to fix the problem overnight, but I think that adding more police officers and firefighters, attracting more retail, and cleaning up the city’s appearance will help make this an attractive place to be when the economy improves to the point where people are house shopping en masse again.

    • Liberty
      May 27, 2011 at 11:49 am

      As someone who just bought a house 11 months ago in LFE I agree with that. LFE does look like a UHaul covention everyday! Not to mention it looks like a thug circus with all of the teens running around with their sagging pants and pit bulls and selling drugs. I feel it’s goning to take a combination of the city, LPD, and the home owners to turn LFE around. I’m really wanting to start a true Neighborhood Watch program, but not sure how to go about it.

  5. michaelinLV
    May 27, 2011 at 12:35 pm

    I appreciate the Mayor taking the time to address these concerns, and I also appreciate her candidness (the primary reason I voted for her!).

    I would ask her and the board to reconsider a point. The Mayor agreed with my earlier analysis, that yes, the city could get by with only a $.75 increase in the property taxes and still do what they want to do this year. I don’t know that I totally buy into her logic about having to get the whole property tax increase at once though. The city has gone without a property tax increase for 18 years, but apparently no increase in taxes has been requested (at least in her time as Alderman). Now an increase is being requested. If one is needed next year too, then make the point to us as citizens that another increase is needed. All hell may brek loose again, but we didn’t elect you to take the easy road, we elected you to take the right road. If we wanted the same ole same ole, Erwin and Slinker were ready and waiting.

    Let’s look at this another way. The Mayor mentions that two potentially splashy retail stores are considering locating here. She asks us to trust her and I will. But then trust us too. If another property tax increase is needed next year, let’s talk then. In the meantime, a tax rate of $.75 will meet the needs of La Vergne for 2011-2012. Maybe we will land those retail stores and the new sales tax will offset the higher need on property taxes, we don’t know this yesr, let’s just deal with what we know.

  6. michaelinLV
    May 27, 2011 at 12:35 pm

    Also, she didn’t answer the toughest question out there – why is there no pool in the proposed rec center???

  7. Tom Broeker
    May 27, 2011 at 1:01 pm

    Michael,
    As the mayor has been very candid and answered these tough questions on the proposed tax increase, I will be vague in my response as to not infringe on the Sunshine law but I do believe the community center would also include a pool.

    Tom Broeker
    207-8030
    394-2821
    tbroeker@lavergnetn.gov

    • joe blow
      May 27, 2011 at 1:48 pm

      Michael why would any of the elected officials want to be put through “tax hell” again next year?? Seriously raise my taxes one time and be done with it for a while! I commend them for doing it all at once. Don’t sneak a tiny one in each year. Do it all now and fix La Vergne PLEASE!! Go up more if it will fix the problems. Who cares what people think as long as you are doing what is needed. Besides Michael there is an election every 2 years. Mo one has had the courage to fix it for 18 years until now. We all know elected officials are not going to vote for a tax increase with an election that year. Let’s thank these people for doing what needs to e done instead of second guessing their every move.

      • michaelinLV
        May 27, 2011 at 4:25 pm

        “why would any of the elected officials want to be put through “tax hell” again next year??”

        If they think that there is enough of a groundwell of opposition to the current increase, they will handle it nxt year as needed.

        “Don’t sneak a tiny one in each year”

        Who said anything about being sneaky?

        “Go up more if it will fix the problems”

        This is subjective. how will this fix the problems? What problems will it fix?

        “Besides Michael there is an election every 2 years.”

        Each position is a 4 year term.

        “We all know elected officials are not going to vote for a tax increase with an election that year”

        Have you ever met Senna Mosley? She is not a ‘typical’ politician. She may disagree with me and proceed with the full increase anyway, but it won’t be because she’s afraid of losing her seat.

        “Let’s thank these people for doing what needs to e done instead of second guessing their every move”

        This is a free country, we not only have a right, but in my opionion an obligation, to question our leaders. If we don’t, what seperates a political election from a popularity contest?

  8. CJ
    May 27, 2011 at 4:29 pm

    “Regarding “the mayor’s vehicle” – it was the vehicle driven by the former IT Director. Not new. The city purchased a 1998 (I believe) Ford Expedition in 2010 which the City Administrator drives. The vehicle assigned to me has been fitted for emergency response where it is used to block streets during crisis. Additionally, my husband does happen to be a fire captain trained as an EMT, so having a radio and lights in that specific vehicle, we are able to sometimes be first on the scene which has resulted in lives saved. If he was not an EMT, then the car would likely be parked permanently at City Hall where all city employees have access to it – just as they do now because it is a community vehicle.

    If the residents demand it, I will idle the vehicle and have one less first responder available for calls, a responder available at no cost to the citizens.”

    LaVergne has an Emergency Operations Coordinator with the same qualifications as her husband and automatically responds at all incidents in the city.

    At what official capacity is this being done? is my question

    The one less responder at no cost answer not buying it, it’s actually costing the city money anytime it responds to a scene.

    One less responder at no cost when the entire fire dept will be there.

    I don’t really think this vehicle should be used to to ferry someone who is responding in an unofficial capacity to emergencies.

    • joe blow
      May 27, 2011 at 4:55 pm

      Michael. If you check the is an election every 2 years the alderman terms are offset. As for the rest you are entitled to your opinion. And yes I have met her.

      CJ who is this EOC person you speak of that responds to all calls? LFD does not respond to all medical calls in the city. I am positive they are working with the county to do first responded calls. They still will not be sending the whole department even then. There is not a specific person who answers all the calls in the city. I personally will take anyone who is qualified to show up if I am hurt. Volunteer or paid I don’t care when I need help send anyone as long as they are competent.

      I still commend them on putting the effort out and making a 5 year plan and sticking to it. If everyone else knows a better way to balance the budget why don’t you call and do it. I have watched the meetings and they at least took the time to have meetings and go line by line unlike the past where it was rubber stamped.

      • michaelinLV
        May 27, 2011 at 8:28 pm

        I didn’t dispute there are elections every 2 years, but each term is 4 years (except I assume Broeker will just complete Mosley’s term?)

        Here is the DNJ’s editorial, it basically sums up my opinion – the Mayor is doing a great job, but all of these increases coming at the same time is too much – http://www.dnj.com/article/20110526/OPINION01/105260311/Editorial-La-Vergne-should-go-slower-tax-hike?odyssey=nav|head

        • joe blow
          May 27, 2011 at 9:04 pm

          What does the county give us for that 2.47 they are charging us? Sure ain’t police or fire! Heck we can’t even get a dog catcher from the county to come up here. Where was the county when I got flooded last May?

          • Ivy
            May 27, 2011 at 9:22 pm

            OMG, for REAL. There are WAY too many animals roaming our neighborhood and good luck getting animal control out here.

          • CJ
            May 27, 2011 at 10:47 pm

            See those nice Ambulances and animal control… are probably the only direct way we see any use of that money, and that Jail in the boro that they want to refurbish.

      • CJ
        May 27, 2011 at 10:44 pm

        One of the assistant fire chiefs to my knowledge is the EOC, if LFD is medical first responding he likely is responding. I can’t remember if they are or not but have been in the past, but not to all calls.
        I can understand your point taking anyone qualified to help you, I know the mayor’s husband and have full confidence in his abilty, but if he’s not employed by the city, a city vehicle should not be used to transport him anywhere.

  9. steve noe
    May 27, 2011 at 11:22 pm

    Well I suppose I just have to do it my self but other than that, I have to say that all the answers given above by the Mayor, I myself pretty much already knew those answers. We have been dodgeing the bullet so to speak for many years and the city of Lavergne has been paying our bills and now the time has come for us as citizens to SUCK IT UP and start paying our part to have our fair city back to the way we would like it, but it does not come with out some heartache and tighter belts. Taking over this city was like stepping in a big pile of hockey doo doo and trying to make it smell like roses, but I am patient and I know you guys down there are doing all you can do and it will TAKE TIME. One thing I never knew is the Mayor’s salary that is laughable, $15,000 per year? SERIOUSLY???? As much time as you spend at the hall, on the phone and being there in general??? YOU GO GIRL!!!!!!!! YOU MUST LOVE THIS CITY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  10. Phil McCracken
    May 27, 2011 at 11:43 pm

    I wouldn’t blame the mayor if she “idles” her husband after all these comments. But I hope it’s not my Mom, Dad, child, friend, minister, teacher, neighbor who loses life because he was closest and could not respond. Just saying!

    • Senna Mosley
      May 28, 2011 at 12:07 pm

      Mr. McCracken,
      No worries. Our personal vehicle has lights and we have been using itfor years. We keep a jump bag in it at all times. It is the blue expedetion it was the one used in the flood.We paid for every penny of gas used ourselves. This winter Ronnie spent over 7 hours following the backhoe during the snow storm to help keep our Public works staff safe. Again, in our truck using our gas! I do love my citzens no matter what some of them say about me and will always make sure they are safe and taken care of to the best of our ability. I am very lucky to have a husband that loves this place like I do. He would never and I mean never let someone suffer if he can help. He has been an EMT with Nashville since 1982 and was in the first class that Metro started. Don’t worry the CJs of La Vergne will not keep us from volunteering when needed regardless of the vehicle used.

      • CJ
        May 28, 2011 at 9:42 pm

        Is this how all questions are answered to citizens of the city? I asked questions and was given a response of this is the way it is? Nice I’d have to say it’s right in line with a lot of the response that goes on here when citizens have concerns and the pro-Senna crowd responds likewise.
        No offense but this is becoming less of This is LaVergne and more of This is the way it is.

  11. Leanne
    May 28, 2011 at 7:29 am

    ONE of my points in saying what I did is the city isnt collecting anything on property taxes and/or water when the house is vacant. The grass being knee and sometimes waist high isnt very attractive to prospective buyers either.
    I challenge any of you to drive around LFE on any ONE street in this subdivision and count how many vacant homes there are.
    Today is Saturday, come on out to LFE and just see for yourself how many UHauls and moving trucks are out here. Pull up at one of those people’s homes and ask them why they are moving.

  12. Question
    May 29, 2011 at 12:24 am

    One more question on the Mayor’s husband driving her vehicle. I understand the need and the reason for volunteering and if I needed the help I would be very grateful. But if something were to happen while he was driving, would the accident still be covered since he is not on La Vergne’s payroll?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *